<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: E-mail-free Fridays</title>
	<atom:link href="http://contentedcowblog.com/2007/10/05/e-mail-free-fridays/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://contentedcowblog.com/2007/10/05/e-mail-free-fridays/</link>
	<description>Building Workplaces That Work</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anna J</title>
		<link>http://contentedcowblog.com/2007/10/05/e-mail-free-fridays/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 21:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contentedcowblog.com/2007/10/05/e-mail-free-fridays/#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Hi folks, thanks for the link to the article and for you good post too. It's right to the point for me either. 

The idea of "e-mail bankruptcy" (mentioned in the article) seems a bit too radical, but limiting emails to a minimal alloted time sounds real healthy. 

I would only setup "out of the office" auto-reply in order not to insult my good contacts by ignoring their emails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi folks, thanks for the link to the article and for you good post too. It&#8217;s right to the point for me either. </p>
<p>The idea of &#8220;e-mail bankruptcy&#8221; (mentioned in the article) seems a bit too radical, but limiting emails to a minimal alloted time sounds real healthy. </p>
<p>I would only setup &#8220;out of the office&#8221; auto-reply in order not to insult my good contacts by ignoring their emails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
